Live
β€”
eineurope/
Home/Uncategorized/Topic Β· πŸŸ‘πŸ‡±πŸ‡§βš”πŸ΄β€β˜ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ A statement from Hezbollah: Today, the crim…
Uncategorized2d ago

πŸŸ‘πŸ‡±πŸ‡§βš”πŸ΄β€β˜ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ A statement from Hezbollah: Today, the criminal enemy, Benjamin...

πŸŸ‘πŸ‡±πŸ‡§βš”πŸ΄β€β˜ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ A statement from Hezbollah: Today, the criminal enemy, Benjamin Netanyahu, claimed that "Hezbollah is u.

Sources
1 verified
Location
β€”
Updated
Sunday, 26 April 2026 at 15:23 UTC
No media Β· text-only dispatch
Synthesis Β· 1 sources
πŸŸ‘πŸ‡±πŸ‡§βš”πŸ΄β€β˜ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ A statement from Hezbollah: Today, the criminal enemy, Benjamin Netanyahu, claimed that "Hezbollah is undermining the ceasefire" and that the enemy has the right to "freedom of action" in Lebanon "in accordance with an agreement with the United States and Lebanon." Hezbollah condemns Netanyahu's remarks and strongly warns of their extreme danger in attempting to involve the Lebanese authorities in a bilateral agreement between him and Washington, in which Lebanon had no say or position. Therefore, Hezbollah emphasizes the following: The continuation of the resistance in targeting the Israeli enemy's settlements on our occupied land, and bombing the enemy's settlements in northern occupied Palestine, is a legitimate response to his persistent violations of the ceasefire since the first day of the temporary truce. These violations exceeded 500 incidents by land, sea, and air, including bombing, demolition, and destruction of homes, and led to the deaths of dozens of martyrs and wounded among our steadfast people. The extension of the ceasefire for additional weeks was supposed, according to Lebanese authorities, to lead to a real ceasefire in which the enemy would stop his violations and aggressions, especially his demolition and destruction of homes in the south. Instead, he escalated his aggressions and violations, confirming his criminal nature, treachery, and disregard for all international laws and conventions. The Lebanese authorities claimed that their main condition for attending the ill-fated meeting in Washington with the enemy was to demand a halt to his aggressions and the start of his withdrawal from our occupied territories. However, we have not heard a clear statement from them demanding this. On the contrary, what was issued by the Lebanese representative was just praise for the US president, the enemy's partner in shedding Lebanese blood, which encouraged the enemy to continue his aggressions and violations. The Lebanese authoriti
e/eineurope Β· topic Β· T-08077